Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02467
Original file (BC 2013 02467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02467

	XXXXXX XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The cardio component of her Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 26 Apr 13, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was unjustly required to complete the 1.0 mile walk in the contested FA.  At her geographically separated unit (GSU) an Army physician placed her on profile from forced marching/running.  However, when the medical paperwork was submitted to the parent Air Force facility the Air Force physician incorrectly cleared her for the 1.0 mile walk.

In support of her contention she submits an Department of the Army Form 3349 Physical Profile dated 17 Apr 13 showing "No running, jumping, or forced marching for 14 days."  Additionally she submits and AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report dated 22 Apr 13 showing her incorrectly cleared to perform the 1.0 mile walk.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving as a Master Sergeant (E-7) in the regular Air Force.

On 26 Apr 13 the applicant participated in the contested FA receiving an unsatisfactory composite score of 31.10.  She scored a 31/0.00 on the cardio portion of the assessment.  With the cardio portion exempted the composite score would be a satisfactory 77.75.

On 2 Jan 14, the request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documentation from an Air Force doctor.”

In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within 5 duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider/MLO and the Exercise Physiologist.  If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.

IAW AFI 36-2905_ AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), paragraphs 2.3.2 through 2.3.2.2 All members must complete the Fitness Screening Questionnaire (FSQ) prior to FA.  The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA.  A medical provider must evaluate all members with health issues identified on the FSQ prior to the FA.  Member must notify the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) of the assessment/training clearance status from the provider.  
______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s, citing the lack of supporting evidence. AFPC/DPSIM notes that if the applicant submits an official statement from the medical provider indicating an error with the AF Form 422 the cardio component could be exempted. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting partial relief.  The office of primary responsibility (OPR) recommended denial of the request for lack of supporting evidence; specifically, a letter from her medical provider stating there was an error with the AF Form 422; however we disagree. While we note there is not an official statement from the applicant’s medical provider, we recognize the Army Form 3349, Physical Profile, dated 17 Apr 13, signed by her provider, exempts from running and walking for 14 days, which covered the time period of the contested FA.  In reference to the AF Form 422, we believe that it is marked correctly, except for the restrictions on the cardio component of the assessment. In this respect, the contested FA should not be declared void, but the cardio component score should be changed to reflect an “Exempt” status.  Therefore, in view of the above and in absence of evidence to the contrary, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 26 Apr 13, be amended to reflect that she was “Exempt” from the cardio component in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02467 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended partial relief.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

		Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 May 13, w/atchs.
		Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 Dec 13, w/atchs.
		Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.




                                   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04034

    Original file (BC 2013 04034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Feb 14, the applicant’s request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02983

    Original file (BC 2013 02983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02983 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member ? Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03063

    Original file (BC 2013 03063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). In this respect, we note the applicant’s submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; a medical determination letter from his medical provider indicating a medical condition; support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04136

    Original file (BC 2013 04136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Jan 13 the applicant completed the contested FA with an unsatisfactory score. On 14 Feb 14, the applicants request was considered and partially granted by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04200

    Original file (BC 2013 04200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a pre-existing medical condition, which should have placed him on profile during the contested FA In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter, signed by his medical provider on 30 Apr 13, which states the applicant “had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” The applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03350

    Original file (BC 2013 03350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. On 7 Apr 14 the applicant submitted a letter from his commander, with attachments, requesting that the contested FA be removed from the record (Exhibit C). However, in response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submits a letter from his commander requesting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03375

    Original file (BC 2013 03375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03375 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 5 Mar 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04664

    Original file (BC 2013 04664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “There was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM4&5 (26 Jun 13 & 3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02337

    Original file (BC 2013 02337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Dec 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of her appeal she submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 11 Mar 13, indicating she...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392

    Original file (BC 2013 03392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.